Ah, I see. To me the original pic doesn't really seem "petite", and I wasn't even taking the height into consideration, but I thought you were somehow which didn't make sense.
Some of the pics from the galleries look much more "petite" / fit and skinny though.
EDIT: Just to add though, I don't think the original intent of the sticky was to debate whether height has to do with petiteness or not, it was more due to just really busty posts without any sort of indication of petiteness.
Think of petite as a build and not just height.
I'm fine with changing the word in the context of this sub. He's right, that is what most of us are looking for -- a boob to weight ratio. I don't give a shit if she's tall. If OP hadn't posted her height nobody would have cared.
So hot in most of those pics. But the treasure trail kills it when it is shown and is very distracting. Pubic hair is great, but not the hair just under the belly button.
That's what the sticky is about, and why I'm posting the height when I can find it.
Dude. How many times do I have to say this? There are exactly three criteria a girl has to meet to be both busty and petite, and therefore welcome in this sub:
* Skinny
* Short
* Tig ol' bittays
Any single one of those is not enough. Two of those is not enough. Why is it so difficult for us to ask that we only post babes who are literally both busty and petite?
5'9 is tall as hell! She's stacked and fine as hell, and thank you for bringing her here... but she ain't "petite"
That's exactly the point. The historically and commonly accepted definition of "petite" requires one to be both short of height and thin of build. A short fat chick isn't petite, and a tall skinny chick isn't petite either.
It's definitely not. Petite is a build, not a height.
The point is that say like in this picture:
http://i.imgur.com/xMwFeJi.jpg
she still has a small **build** even if she isn't short, and shouldn't be disqualified just because she is on the taller side. Just as in the same way someone who is obese and under 5'3" isn't considered petite just because they are short, in this definition.
(Edited for clarity)
Why would people still be up voting this god damn comment?
Not to mention that this chick is reposted all over the place constantly and would have taken anyone 2 seconds to source - she should be on the banner here if she isn't already.
I don't think I had read anything but the title! I'm surprised by the vehemence...
I didn't want Helga gone (she meets my admittedly entirely subjective eye-ball test), just was remarking cuz she's a lot taller than I expected.
Because I don't use the height as a way to disqualify for this sub.
> petite
> *adjective*
> (of a woman) having a small and attractively dainty build
Take it up with the New Oxford American Dictionary.
Then why did you submit the original post in the first place?
Yeah, except that's not right. "Skinny", "thin", and "slim" are builds. "Petite" specifically refers to both height *and* build.
I'm saying she shouldn't be disqualified just because she is tall, in the same way that someone shouldn't automatically be included just because they are short.
Jeez, as a 6' tall guy, 5'3 is a pretty low threshold for petite! That is TINY! (I'd love to see what we could find at 5' and under though... I had a busty ex who was 4'10... Sometimes I'd love to have a tumble with her again!)
Really if i can see she's short, she can get away with more padding than if she is taller. Otherwise, like I said, I eyeball it. If she looks small, and her boobs are big on her? Likely a pass. I'd not have batted an eye at Lovekaty if you hadn't included her height.
Ah, I see. To me the original pic doesn't really seem "petite", and I wasn't even taking the height into consideration, but I thought you were somehow which didn't make sense. Some of the pics from the galleries look much more "petite" / fit and skinny though. EDIT: Just to add though, I don't think the original intent of the sticky was to debate whether height has to do with petiteness or not, it was more due to just really busty posts without any sort of indication of petiteness.
Think of petite as a build and not just height.
I'm fine with changing the word in the context of this sub. He's right, that is what most of us are looking for -- a boob to weight ratio. I don't give a shit if she's tall. If OP hadn't posted her height nobody would have cared.
So hot in most of those pics. But the treasure trail kills it when it is shown and is very distracting. Pubic hair is great, but not the hair just under the belly button.
That's what the sticky is about, and why I'm posting the height when I can find it.
Dude. How many times do I have to say this? There are exactly three criteria a girl has to meet to be both busty and petite, and therefore welcome in this sub: * Skinny * Short * Tig ol' bittays Any single one of those is not enough. Two of those is not enough. Why is it so difficult for us to ask that we only post babes who are literally both busty and petite?
5'9 is tall as hell! She's stacked and fine as hell, and thank you for bringing her here... but she ain't "petite"
That's exactly the point. The historically and commonly accepted definition of "petite" requires one to be both short of height and thin of build. A short fat chick isn't petite, and a tall skinny chick isn't petite either.
[Relevant](http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mf5s0vlkqO1rbn1qw.gif)
It's definitely not. Petite is a build, not a height.
The point is that say like in this picture: http://i.imgur.com/xMwFeJi.jpg she still has a small **build** even if she isn't short, and shouldn't be disqualified just because she is on the taller side. Just as in the same way someone who is obese and under 5'3" isn't considered petite just because they are short, in this definition. (Edited for clarity)
Why would people still be up voting this god damn comment? Not to mention that this chick is reposted all over the place constantly and would have taken anyone 2 seconds to source - she should be on the banner here if she isn't already.
I don't think I had read anything but the title! I'm surprised by the vehemence... I didn't want Helga gone (she meets my admittedly entirely subjective eye-ball test), just was remarking cuz she's a lot taller than I expected.
Because I don't use the height as a way to disqualify for this sub.
> petite > *adjective* > (of a woman) having a small and attractively dainty build Take it up with the New Oxford American Dictionary.
Then why did you submit the original post in the first place?
Yeah, except that's not right. "Skinny", "thin", and "slim" are builds. "Petite" specifically refers to both height *and* build.
That's a scar bro
http://imgur.com/a/AulLr http://imgur.com/a/Jgj6S http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Helga_Lovekaty 5'9"
I'm saying she shouldn't be disqualified just because she is tall, in the same way that someone shouldn't automatically be included just because they are short.
Jeez, as a 6' tall guy, 5'3 is a pretty low threshold for petite! That is TINY! (I'd love to see what we could find at 5' and under though... I had a busty ex who was 4'10... Sometimes I'd love to have a tumble with her again!) Really if i can see she's short, she can get away with more padding than if she is taller. Otherwise, like I said, I eyeball it. If she looks small, and her boobs are big on her? Likely a pass. I'd not have batted an eye at Lovekaty if you hadn't included her height.
You da real mvp
5'9" != small