That's my exact issue, in addition to THEY DON'T NEED IT.
Maybe a smaller chested girl. I think the most disappointing was the Tessa Fowler sets. They made em look too big, and they overglammed her. Tessa's site is much better.
It is and isn't. Most of their girls are stacked as is. They don't need the help of fancy shots or photo enhancements.
Fisheye lens, either physical or in post-production. It is a hallmark of PinupFiles' photos.
A LOT of September Carrino's pictures are fisheyed, wherever you might see them. She has amazing breasts and the fisheye just makes them look stupid...like they are 3 times the size of her head or something, and the areolae are bigger than her face. Silly. I just want to see beautiful huge real breasts on gorgeous models! If you have a model like that, don't screw it up! Is that too much to ask? Can I get an upvote for this concept please? :) lol
Pinup files has a talent of making tits look bigger than they actually are...Stacey, Tessa, Erica Campbell...everyone.
Really obvious with the Sammy Brady and Alice Goodwin shoots.
WOW! All those selfies! Good album, good job dude. Thanks. How'd you get all of these, if you don't mind me asking?
Stacey basically has perfect breasts. A goddess.
I really wish they wouldn't use that fisheye lens. It makes no sense. They specialize in big boob girls, and they have many of the world's very best, especially natural-breasted models. It seems obvious that lovers of big natural breasts would not want to see a picture artificially enhanced to increase breast size, any more than they would want to see a breast enhanced by an implant to increase its size.
If they want to fisheye their bolt-on girls, be my guest. Who cares.
You say that like its a bad thing...
http://imgur.com/a/gRYnn
That's my exact issue, in addition to THEY DON'T NEED IT. Maybe a smaller chested girl. I think the most disappointing was the Tessa Fowler sets. They made em look too big, and they overglammed her. Tessa's site is much better.
It is and isn't. Most of their girls are stacked as is. They don't need the help of fancy shots or photo enhancements.
Fisheye lens, either physical or in post-production. It is a hallmark of PinupFiles' photos.
A LOT of September Carrino's pictures are fisheyed, wherever you might see them. She has amazing breasts and the fisheye just makes them look stupid...like they are 3 times the size of her head or something, and the areolae are bigger than her face. Silly. I just want to see beautiful huge real breasts on gorgeous models! If you have a model like that, don't screw it up! Is that too much to ask? Can I get an upvote for this concept please? :) lol
Pinup files has a talent of making tits look bigger than they actually are...Stacey, Tessa, Erica Campbell...everyone.
Really obvious with the Sammy Brady and Alice Goodwin shoots.
WOW! All those selfies! Good album, good job dude. Thanks. How'd you get all of these, if you don't mind me asking? Stacey basically has perfect breasts. A goddess.
I really wish they wouldn't use that fisheye lens. It makes no sense. They specialize in big boob girls, and they have many of the world's very best, especially natural-breasted models. It seems obvious that lovers of big natural breasts would not want to see a picture artificially enhanced to increase breast size, any more than they would want to see a breast enhanced by an implant to increase its size. If they want to fisheye their bolt-on girls, be my guest. Who cares.
Thanks! I subscribed immediately!