I doubt it. His work is not illegal, just objectionable for some people. Non sexualized photos of nude children are legal and are common in naturist settings.
If this is of a child, it really should not be in a sub like this.
Does this mean we could get in trouble for being here?
I think some of his photos are beautiful, but be aware there is controversy surrounding his work. He photographed naturist families and especially children. This photo is actually of a child.
I know what I'm getting people as a shock gift now.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0893815950/ref=pd_aw_sim_b_2?refRID=1EER67JA0QS1ER25Z60T
I doubt it. His work is not illegal, just objectionable for some people. Non sexualized photos of nude children are legal and are common in naturist settings.
If this is of a child, it really should not be in a sub like this.
Does this mean we could get in trouble for being here?
I think some of his photos are beautiful, but be aware there is controversy surrounding his work. He photographed naturist families and especially children. This photo is actually of a child.
I know what I'm getting people as a shock gift now. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0893815950/ref=pd_aw_sim_b_2?refRID=1EER67JA0QS1ER25Z60T